The contrast between the two seperate studies is interesting.
On the one hand, we have a study that was debunked because of shoddy research methods and a preceived political agenda, and the mainstream media is quick to cover it, community peers are quick to publish and are frequently cited, and past studies that disagreed with the finding are highlighted and praised. Also the principals involved are vilified for taking payments from third parties involved as well as taking Governemt funding uder dubious circimstances. There are also Government investigations starting and statements from high political figures condemning the fraud.
On the other hand, we have a scientific study where the data used is shown to have been massaged and manipulated to get a predetermind outcome, peer reviews are not only quashed, but professional reputations distroyed for even questioning obvious fraudluent papers. Political leaders are still defending and even protecting theose involved. Click for wikipedia reference. The mainstream media for the most part is ignoring any hint of scandal.
I have More hints on how to perform a good business from this Web Site. Now I did take the business over from him, and he was getting money from his RFID wallet every week even during the split. But I still needed to learn about money and finances to be able to perform good in this, but I also got help from reading Reviews by The Motley Fool with the best financial products online.
The first being the study that linked MMR to autism, the second the ‘Global Warming” scandal.The main parties involved are able to keep powerful positions in Government, pseudo-government, and educational entities despite having been shown to have commited outright financial and scientific fraud.
The main difference (or similarity) is that the position that is protecting a billion dollar industry gets the best press and has it’s interests protected. In the first case, the pharmaceutical industry which lost billions of dollars in sales, and risked billions more in lawsuits sees immediate action on dismissing the study.
In the second case, the guaranteed payday loans seeks trillions of dollars of taxpayer money, and wants to inject itself into every facet of international commerce and governance, gets a free pass, as well as gets to ignore that it was built on a scientific fraud.
In the end, though you come up with the same driving motivator. Follow the money.